121

Re: Šis tas no muslimu valstīm un sabiedrībām

ahmeds wrote:

Emirātos smēķēšanu apkaros ar cietumsodiem
http://www.delfi.lv/news/world/other/em … d=29113549
Apvienotajos Arābu Emirātos pieņemts federālais likums smēķēšanas apkarošanas likums, kura neievērošana tiks sodīta ar ievērojamiem naudas sodiem un pat cietumsodiem, ceturtdien vēsta "RIA Novosti".

Jaunais likums aizliedz ievest valstī jebkurus tabakas izstrādājumus, uz kuru iepakojumiem nav skaidru brīdinājumu par tabakas kaitīgumu, un aizliedz pārdot tabakas izstrādājumus par 18 gadiem jaunākām personām.

Tiek aizliegta smēķēšana sabiedriskajā transportā un slēgtās telpās, tempļos, izglītības un medicīnas iestādēs, ka arī stadionos. Savukārt tabakas tirdzniecību drīkstēs īstenot tikai stingri noteiktās vietās.

Likuma pārkāpējiem draud naudas sods līdz vienam miljonam dirhamu (vairāk nekā 132 tūkstoši latu) un ne mazāk kā divi gadi cietumā.

Sen jau bija laiks, smird, ka elpu rauj ciet!

122

Re: Šis tas no muslimu valstīm un sabiedrībām

Sudāna atkal uz pilsoņu kara sliekšņa
http://www.delfi.lv/news/world/other/su … d=29125731
Vismaz 140 cilvēki gājuši bojā starpetniskajās sadursmēs Sudānas dienvidos, ceturtdien vēsta BBC.

Vairākums no tiem nogalināti sestdien un svētdien Tondžas ciemā.

Starptautiskās organizācijas norāda, ka 2005. gadā Sudānā parakstītā pamiera vienošanās ir uz saraušanas robežas un valstī nupat sāksies jauns plaša mēroga konflikts.

Pēc ANO datiem, 2009. gadā vien etnisko grupējumu pretošanās dēļ valstī gājuši bojā vairāk nekā 2000 cilvēku. Konfliktu pasliktina hroniska iedzīvotāju nabadzība un saspringta politiskā situācija.

Pirms pieciem gadiem noslēgtais pamiers izbeidza 22 gadu pilsoņu karu, kura laikā gājuši bojā aptuveni 1,5 miljoni cilvēku.

Pēc vienošanās nosacījumiem, valsts dienvidu galvenais politiskais spēks, bijusī nemiernieku Tautas kustība Sudānas atbrīvošanai iekļuva pārejas valdības sastāvā kopā ar ziemeļu reģionus kontrolējošo Nacionālo kongresu, kura pārstāvis ir pašreizējais Sudānas prezidents Omars Baširs.

Par vienu no galvenajiem pamiera nolikumiem kļuva lēmums par referenduma sarīkošanu 2011. gada janvārī par neatkarības piešķiršanu naftas bagātajai Sudānas dienvidu daļai.

Sudānas vēstnieks Lielbritānijā Omars Muhammads Siddiks atzinis, ka situācija valsts dienvidos pēdējā laikā būtiski pasliktinājusies. Pēc viņa vārdiem, ar ko pagadās bruņojušās vietējās kopienas risina savā starpā starpcilšu karus, galvenokārt ierobežotu pārtikas resursu un ūdens dēļ.
==========


Nu ko var muldeet! Ne jau Sudaana. Sudaanas dienvidos miitoshie pagaani/kristieshi nekaadi jeerinji nav. Vinji briivo laiku pavada izdarot reidus uz kaiminja goviim un sievaam. Peec diviem gadiem Sudaanas dienvidi visdriizaak buus jauna neatkariiga valsts, kuras elite turpinaas zagt naftas ienaakumus (tagad dienvidnieki sanjem 25% naftas ienaakumu,  bet par 98% viss ir nozagts un aizpluust uz Eiropas bankaam), un parastie ljautinji lauku rajonos turpinaas skaidrot kuram ir tiesiibas ganiit un dzirdiit govis attieciigajaa apgabalaa.
Un tas nav tikai veesturiskais naids starp divaam lielaakajaam tautaam - Dinka un Nuer. Vinji karo arii pa klaniem. Gluzhi kaa pagaajushogad viens Nuer klans apsita otru Nuer klanu, plus veel visaadus paliidziibas organizaaciju darbiniekus.
Vinjiem shkjiet ies tik dranjkjigi, ka pat zheel metaas.

Dievs zina labāk. Tekstā viss labais no Islāma, bet trūkumi un sliktais no manis. Ja mans dažkārt skarbais tonis kādu aizvaino, tad ziniet, ka tas nav mans nolūks. Mans nolūks un novēlējums ir lai cilvēki patiesi apdomātu savas attiecības ar Dievu un cenšanās piedāvāt Islāmu tāds kāds tas ir. Ja es sev paglaimoju, tad saku, ka man ir nesabalansētas zināšanas. Arī Islāma zinātnieki dažkārt kļūdās un maldina savos tekstos citus, tad jau ahmeds kādu reizi savās amatieriskajās zināšanās noteikti. Šī foruma darbība un mani komentāri nav attiecināmi uz Latvijas muslimu kopienu vai organizācijām. Es stāstu par Islāmu tā kā to saprotu šodien, jau 7 gadus apgūstot Islāmu, un manām zināšanām augot, nākotnē varētu zināt un skaidrot precīzāk, nekļūdīgāk, ar mazāk pārpratumiem un labākā izteiksmes veidā. Es gaidu padomus, bet kritiku uztveru neveselīgi.

123

Re: Šis tas no muslimu valstīm un sabiedrībām

Nigērijā akās atrod 100 cilvēku līķus
http://www.delfi.lv/news/world/accident … d=29450483

Nigērijas centrālajā daļā, kur notika sadursmes starp musulmaņu un kristiešu grupējumiem, akās atrasti no 100 līdz 150 cilvēku mirstīgās atliekas, ziņo BBC.



Kārtējo asiņaino sadursmju dēļ Nigērijas pilsētā Džosā aptuveni tūkstotis cilvēku bija spiesti pamest savas mājas. Lai gan pilsētā ir izsludināta komandantstunda un vardarbība ir apturēta, situācija aizvien ir saspringta.

Sadursmes reliģijas jautājumu dēļ šajā reģionā notikušas jau iepriekš. Džosa atrodas Nigērijas centrālajā daļā, kas atdala musulmaņu ziemeļdaļu no kristiešu dienvidu daļas. Pirms diviem gadiem sadursmēs gājuši bojā aptuveni 200 cilvēki, bet 2001.gadā nekārtībās nogalināti aptuveni 1000 cilvēku.
------------------

Nemieri saakaas, kad viens muslims, kura maaju nodedzinaaja pirms gada, gribeeja to atjaunot. Kaadaa masdzhidaa esot nogalinaati milzums daudz braalju. Upuri neesot paaraak milziigi, jo kaadu pilseetas rajonu izdevaas evakueet, lai gan muslimiem bija tikai chetri shaujam ierochi.

Dievs zina labāk. Tekstā viss labais no Islāma, bet trūkumi un sliktais no manis. Ja mans dažkārt skarbais tonis kādu aizvaino, tad ziniet, ka tas nav mans nolūks. Mans nolūks un novēlējums ir lai cilvēki patiesi apdomātu savas attiecības ar Dievu un cenšanās piedāvāt Islāmu tāds kāds tas ir. Ja es sev paglaimoju, tad saku, ka man ir nesabalansētas zināšanas. Arī Islāma zinātnieki dažkārt kļūdās un maldina savos tekstos citus, tad jau ahmeds kādu reizi savās amatieriskajās zināšanās noteikti. Šī foruma darbība un mani komentāri nav attiecināmi uz Latvijas muslimu kopienu vai organizācijām. Es stāstu par Islāmu tā kā to saprotu šodien, jau 7 gadus apgūstot Islāmu, un manām zināšanām augot, nākotnē varētu zināt un skaidrot precīzāk, nekļūdīgāk, ar mazāk pārpratumiem un labākā izteiksmes veidā. Es gaidu padomus, bet kritiku uztveru neveselīgi.

124

Re: Šis tas no muslimu valstīm un sabiedrībām

Bangladešā pulcējas miljons svētceļnieku
http://www.tvnet.lv/zinas/arvalstis/301 … etcelnieku
Vakar Bangladešā pulcējušies aptuveni miljons musulmaņu svētceļnieku.

Musulmaņi Bangladešā sanākuši uz ikgadējiem trīs dienas ilgajiem reliģiskajiem svētkiem, kas veltīti tam, lai izlūgtos Allāha svētību.

Galvenās svētku norises notiks Turagas upes krastos aptuveni 20 kilometrus no Bangladešas galvaspilsētas Dakas.

Kā jau līdzīgās masu sanākšanās, arī Bangladešā liela uzmanība veltīta rūpēm par drošību. Lai maksimāli mazinātu vardarbīgu incidentu iespēju, svētku laikā aizliegts rīkot politiska rakstura diskusijas. Tāpat drošības uzturēšanā iesaistīti aptuveni astoņi tūkstoši drošībnieku.

========
KAS TAS TAADS?

Dievs zina labāk. Tekstā viss labais no Islāma, bet trūkumi un sliktais no manis. Ja mans dažkārt skarbais tonis kādu aizvaino, tad ziniet, ka tas nav mans nolūks. Mans nolūks un novēlējums ir lai cilvēki patiesi apdomātu savas attiecības ar Dievu un cenšanās piedāvāt Islāmu tāds kāds tas ir. Ja es sev paglaimoju, tad saku, ka man ir nesabalansētas zināšanas. Arī Islāma zinātnieki dažkārt kļūdās un maldina savos tekstos citus, tad jau ahmeds kādu reizi savās amatieriskajās zināšanās noteikti. Šī foruma darbība un mani komentāri nav attiecināmi uz Latvijas muslimu kopienu vai organizācijām. Es stāstu par Islāmu tā kā to saprotu šodien, jau 7 gadus apgūstot Islāmu, un manām zināšanām augot, nākotnē varētu zināt un skaidrot precīzāk, nekļūdīgāk, ar mazāk pārpratumiem un labākā izteiksmes veidā. Es gaidu padomus, bet kritiku uztveru neveselīgi.

125

Re: Šis tas no muslimu valstīm un sabiedrībām

ja nemaldos tad jamaat tabligh ijtemaa, kas notiek shajaas dienas Bangladeshaa.

126

Re: Šis tas no muslimu valstīm un sabiedrībām

Nigeria: Why Jos May Erupt Again?
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Sate … FMAELayout
A Glimpse on What Lies Behind the Crisis

By  Kamal Badr

Editor-in-Chief, IslamOnline.net

Image

Jos has witnessed four days of deadly clashes, which left 300 killed. Thousands of desperate Nigerians fled Jos to seek refuge in mosques, churches and camps in neighboring towns.(Reuters Photo)
While it seems that the federal government of Nigeria has succeeded in bringing the Jos crisis under control, the situation remains a matter of concern, both for the Nigerians and the international community.

Just as in similar cases of violence, which hunts Nigeria from time to time, the spate of violence that followed the incident does not augur well for the future of the country, which is known as the giant of Africa.

As most of the perpetrators of the last Sunday bloodletting in Jos are still at large, the helpless victims are left to lick their wounds in the aftermath of a disaster they could have been spared had the government paid enough attention to the crisis.

Who Is to Blame?
Jos carnage comes in the shadow of a deep political crisis with the absence of the president.
Regardless of whether some individuals with religious extremism or tribal motives were responsible for the occurrence of such violence, which has cast its ugly shadow on the country's international image, the government cannot be exonerated from blame.

Actually, the incident of Jos has once again brought to the surface some sort of political missteps and lack of seriousness on the part of government in rising up to the occasion and addressing this issue once and for all.

The crisis also came at a very sensitive time for the country, which is already in a political crisis with the absence of its president, Umaru Yar'Adua, who is believed to have been receiving medical treatment in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for more than two months now.

This has thrown the country into some kind of a leadership vacuum, though it has been recently filled by Yar'Adua's deputy, Goodluck Jonathan (1). So, it is not strange that some people are blaming this political crisis for the Jos carnage (2).

Now that the situation is a bit calm and there is a call for investigation, the federal government has to show more seriousness and study the roots of this crisis, which has plagued the people of Jos for decades; without this, it will be difficult to reach any tangible solution, no matter how huge the number of military trucks deployed to quell the riots.

Unending Episode of Violence
the occurrence of such carnage and violence indicates flagrant flaws in the country's security system. (Reuters Photo)

Actually, whenever such crises beak out, it is a normal ritual of the government to come out and announce several security measures to quell the violence and assure the Nigerians that such escalation would never reoccur. But the fact that the occurrence of such carnage and violence is witnessed over and over again indicates flagrant flaws in the country's security system.

Without this being fixed, fears will remain that what happened in Jos will eventually ignite the fire of backlash and reprisals in neighboring Nigerian states, like Bauchi, which is known for its volatility when it comes to ethnic or religious tensions.

According to the local Daily Sun, Bauchi is always a ready place for reprisals. Even the Danish cartoon and Miss World crises generated reprisals there, not to mention Jos, which is close (3).

Why Jos?
Jos is in the crossroads of Nigeria's Muslim north and Christian south. In Jos, religion and race interplay.

Why the government has to take the crisis of Jos seriously lies in the fact that the city is not only a place in one of the most populous regions in Nigeria, but also the country's prime tourist destination with its glamorous beauty and alluring landscape, which attract visitors from across the globe.

Proper attention is needed here because the city is actually a strategic area in Nigeria: It serves as a meeting point between the northern part of the country, which has a Muslim majority, and the southern part, which has a Christian majority.

The city itself is also divided by a religious line. It has Muslims and Christians living in semi-segregated areas. The Muslims are Hausa-Fulani people and are regarded as settlers, though they have been living in the city for decades.

The land owners are the Berom (or Birom) people, who are viewed as a minority ethnic group in Jos. Given the fact that they are concentrated mostly in Jos North alongside of the Hausa-Fulani people, ethnic tension escalates.

So, what complicates the problem in Jos is also the system of classifying the people into settlers and natives, for this weakens the sense of unity, which is supposed to protect the fabric of any civilized society.

There have been several complaints from the Berom people that they are constantly being discriminated against by the government in favor of the Hausa-Fulani people. This means that struggle to have access to power and land resources might also lie at the roots of the crisis.

Settlers Vs. Indigenes

Thus, consigning a large portion of society into the status of "strangers" (regardless of the fact that some of these people might be first- or second-generation descendants of the early settlers) will definitely create a situation of constitutional imbalance, as one analyst put it.

The adverse consequence of this segregation is rendering these so-called strangers disenfranchised both politically and economically (4).

Now, the question on the lips of everyone concerned with the affairs of Nigeria is, when is this going to stop?

Jos, the capital of Plateau State, has been at the center of both the religious and political feuds that have plagued the country for years. Similar violence erupted in the city in 1994, 2001, and 2008.

Although Western media have rushed to portray these incidents of violence as a Muslim-Christian religious conflict, most of these incidents have roots in political causes, especially when one realizes that the 2008 riot had a lot to do with a disputed election that involved political parties vying for the state.

But this does not take religion away: In fact, it is quite amazing that any riot in this part of Nigeria transforms from political into religious, and this shows the great impact that religion has on shaping the discourse of integration in the city.

Coupling with this fact is the issue of Boko Haram, which took the whole nation by storm last year when an Islamic group declared a self-proclaimed Jihad against the whole country. The clash began in the nearby Bauchi State, and hundreds of people were killed before the violence sporadically spilled over into Yobe.

That bloody incident is enough to echo a sense of fear in the minds of people whenever religious or sectarian violence breaks out in the North. In fact, some people have already started pointing to a foreign element that may be behind the Jos mayhem; some even went to extremes and claimed that the crisis has the fingerprint of some groups in the Middle East.

The Search for Unity
Government should fulfill its obligations under the constitution to achieve national integration.

What this actually shows is a deep sense of division among the people of the city, who are supposed to be living together in harmony. Therefore, it is believed that the subject of integration should not be ruled out if there is a serious attempt to solve the crisis.

The reason for this is that in any situation where a segment of society is classified into settlers and natives, the government needs to work hard to forge unity and solidarity among all citizens. This will help create an atmosphere where the so-called settlers would integrate properly and live in harmony with the rest of society.

What buttresses the argument of the necessity of looking into the issue of integration is that the 1999 constitution itself lays strong emphasis on this. Article 15(2) states,
"National integration shall be actively encouraged, whilst discrimination on the grounds of place of origin, sex, religion, status, ethnic or linguistic association or ties shall be prohibited".

To promote such national integration, the constitution also makes it an obligation upon the government to "(a) provide adequate facilities for and encourage free mobility of people, goods and services throughout the Federation. (b) secure full residence rights for every citizen in all parts of the Federation. (c) encourage inter-marriage among persons from different places of origin, or of different religious, ethnic or linguistic association or ties."

The government should also work hard to "foster a feeling of belonging and of involvement among the various people of the Federation, to the extent that loyalty to the nation shall override sectional loyalties" (5).

The above-mentioned strategy should be the government's policy in Jos and other Nigerian cities that are also structured along the "settlers-natives" line, like Warri, Ife, and Modakeke in southwestern Nigeria.

The federal government should also learn from other countries with similar experiences, as some analysts have advised. One can recall here countries like Rwanda and Fiji, which have a similar pattern of sectarian strife that wreaked havoc in the two nations and resulted in a large number of human casualties. 

In a nutshell, what remains for the government is to dig down to the core of the problem, sit down with all the parties involved, engage the elders in the city in any peace initiative, and most importantly rise up to people's expectations and preserve their rights enshrined in the constitution. Hopefully this will pave the way for an eternal, peaceful solution to the age-old crisis.

Sources:

1. Goodenough, Patrick. "Nigeria's Religious Violence Comes Amid Political Crisis." CNSNews.com. 20 Jan. 2010. Accessed 26 Jan. 2010.

2. "Power Vacuum Responsible for Jos Mayhem." Punch on the Web. 20 Jan. 2010. Accessed 26 Jan. 2010.

3. Orude, Paul. "Jos Mayhem: Fears of Reprisal Attacks Heightens Tension in Bauchi." Daily Sun. 25 Jan. 2010. Accessed 26 Jan. 2010.

4. "Nigeria: Jos - One Riot Too Many." AllAfrica.com. 22 Jan. 2010. Accessed 26 Jan. 2010.

5. International Centre for Nigerian Law. "Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria — 1999." Nigeria-Law.org. 24 Jan. 2009. Accessed 26 Jan. 2010.

Kamal Badr is the the Editor-in-Chief of IslamOnline.net’s English Web site.

Dievs zina labāk. Tekstā viss labais no Islāma, bet trūkumi un sliktais no manis. Ja mans dažkārt skarbais tonis kādu aizvaino, tad ziniet, ka tas nav mans nolūks. Mans nolūks un novēlējums ir lai cilvēki patiesi apdomātu savas attiecības ar Dievu un cenšanās piedāvāt Islāmu tāds kāds tas ir. Ja es sev paglaimoju, tad saku, ka man ir nesabalansētas zināšanas. Arī Islāma zinātnieki dažkārt kļūdās un maldina savos tekstos citus, tad jau ahmeds kādu reizi savās amatieriskajās zināšanās noteikti. Šī foruma darbība un mani komentāri nav attiecināmi uz Latvijas muslimu kopienu vai organizācijām. Es stāstu par Islāmu tā kā to saprotu šodien, jau 7 gadus apgūstot Islāmu, un manām zināšanām augot, nākotnē varētu zināt un skaidrot precīzāk, nekļūdīgāk, ar mazāk pārpratumiem un labākā izteiksmes veidā. Es gaidu padomus, bet kritiku uztveru neveselīgi.

127

Re: Šis tas no muslimu valstīm un sabiedrībām

Dānijas īpašo uzdevumu vienība ieņem triecienā pirātu nolaupītu kuģi
http://www.delfi.lv/news/world/other/da … d=29736541


Dānijas armijas īpašo uzdevumu vienība piektdien triecienā ieņēma Adenas līcī pirātu nolaupīto Slovēnijas kravas kuģi, atbrīvojot 25 komandas locekļus, pavēstīja Eiropas Savienības (ES) pretpirātisma flotes spēku pārstāvis.

"Tā ir pirmā reize, kad noticis šāda veida uzbrukums," aģentūrai AFP sacīja ES Karaflotes spēku (NAVFOR) pārstāvis Džons Hārbors.

Operācija notika ap plkst.13 pēc Latvijas laika, neilgi pēc tam, kad pirāti bija sagrābuši zem Antigvas un Barbudas karoga peldošo kuģi "Ariella".

Kuģa komandai izdevās nosūtīt trauksmes signālu, kuru pārtvēra Somālijas ūdeņos patrulējošie starptautiskās koalīcijas spēki.

NAVFOR lidmašīna devās uz notikuma vietu un izsauca Dānijas NATO spēku kuģi.

Īpašo uzdevumu vienība varēja kuģi ieņemt triecienā, jo visa komanda bija ieslēgusies kajītē.

========
Sen jau bija laiks. Manis peec - piraatus haiziviim.

Dievs zina labāk. Tekstā viss labais no Islāma, bet trūkumi un sliktais no manis. Ja mans dažkārt skarbais tonis kādu aizvaino, tad ziniet, ka tas nav mans nolūks. Mans nolūks un novēlējums ir lai cilvēki patiesi apdomātu savas attiecības ar Dievu un cenšanās piedāvāt Islāmu tāds kāds tas ir. Ja es sev paglaimoju, tad saku, ka man ir nesabalansētas zināšanas. Arī Islāma zinātnieki dažkārt kļūdās un maldina savos tekstos citus, tad jau ahmeds kādu reizi savās amatieriskajās zināšanās noteikti. Šī foruma darbība un mani komentāri nav attiecināmi uz Latvijas muslimu kopienu vai organizācijām. Es stāstu par Islāmu tā kā to saprotu šodien, jau 7 gadus apgūstot Islāmu, un manām zināšanām augot, nākotnē varētu zināt un skaidrot precīzāk, nekļūdīgāk, ar mazāk pārpratumiem un labākā izteiksmes veidā. Es gaidu padomus, bet kritiku uztveru neveselīgi.

128

Re: Šis tas no muslimu valstīm un sabiedrībām

Dubai, debt and a return to reality
www.atimes.com

By Chan Akya

    Oh, who jilted me; sublime images with me remained, oh, who jilted me. Follows you a heart whose owner, for love, owns it not ...
    From the poem Jilted, by Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum, ruler of Dubai.

Just as America hunkered down for its Thanksgiving holiday last week and the Muslim world sat down for the long Eid weekend, a bombshell announcement from the rulers of Dubai, one of the seven emirates that comprise the United Arab Emirates, flashed across screens globally. Barely a few hours after receiving US$5 billion in fresh funds from the capital of the UAE, Abu Dhabi, for Dubai's government debt obligations, the rulers of Dubai had decided to push the tiny emirate's biggest company - Dubai World - into the perilous world of debt restructuring.

The reasons for the news being a surprise were manifold, not the least that the government had constantly assured investors (verbally - never in writing of course) that it would stand behind the Dubai World conglomerate under all circumstances. In the event,


they appeared only to stand behind the company in order to push it over the cliff edge and into the creditors' abyss.

Early this year, I wrote:

    One of the more interesting stories deals with Dubai, the previously sleepy smugglers' port in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) that suddenly had aspirations to global dominance, as exemplified by the Burj Dubai, the world's tallest building (as an aside, building the world's tallest building almost always condemns the country to an economic downturn; the skyscraper curse is not urban legend).

    Anyway, for a country with global aspirations and supposedly $100 billion in asset values through the stock and property markets, Dubai found it well-nigh impossible to fund the ruling family's hobby horses in banks, hotels and ports around the world, not to mention the real-estate boom that has been ongoing from 2002.

    The ruling al-Maktoum family of Dubai reportedly approached their cousins, the al-Zayed family, running Abu Dhabi, for terms of a bailout. Initial conversations were allegedly heated, with the latter demanding that Dubai hand over control of its iconic airline, Emirates, as well as stakes in its biggest property firms, including Emaar and even Dubai Holdings (the ruling family's in-house collection of vanity businesses). With oil prices down and nursing its own losses on ill-fated investments in American and European financial firms in 2008, the al-Zayed family was reportedly not very keen on being on the delivering side of charity. (See Beggar, I thy neighbor, Asia Times Online, February 2009).

And later in the article:

    The more puritanical rulers of Abu Dhabi now control a greater proportion of the UAE federation, after subscribing to $10 billion of a bond issue launched by the Dubai government this week. With the property market looking to face a multi-year slowdown and its banks beaten down by losses on global investments, it is highly likely that Dubai will default on the terms of this bond, among others over the next five years or so, in turn providing even more control to Abu Dhabi directly.

As it turned out, we didn't have to wait five years or anything of the sort. Needing a further $10 billion in funding by the end of the year, the rulers of Dubai appear to have spoken again to their cousins in Abu Dhabi, only for the previous conditions - namely Dubai's corporate jewels to be handed over to the latter - to have been mentioned again.

We will probably never find out quite what happened in these negotiations, but the upshot of receiving $5 billion for the government of Dubai last Wednesday, November 25, appears to have been an immediate announcement of a "standstill" on the debts of the conglomerate Dubai World for a period of six months.

In the total debt pile of $59 billion attributed to Dubai World, a large amount comes under the name of Nakheel, the construction company behind some of the most iconic developments in the city, such as palm-shaped reclamation off the coast and a host of reclaimed islands in the shape of a map of the world.

The real trouble with the announcement though is that Nakheel has an Islamic bond (sukuk) due in the middle of December to the tune of $4 billion or so. This is almost sure to default because time is too short for investors to get together and agree to a standstill. Also, there is no specific clause such as "standstill" in the debt world, just an agreement to restructure.

At the weekend, the UAE's central bank said it stood behind the country's banks, easing some concern about a possible default by Dubai World. The Abu Dhabi-based central bank of the UAE said lenders would be able to borrow using a special facility tied to their current accounts, Bloomberg reported.

TBTF and real estate
Even so, with the events in Dubai, one of the central tenets of the so-called recovery from the global financial crisis was broken. This relates to the concept of "too big to fail", implying that governments and central banks will always protect systemically important entities.

For the tiny city-state of Dubai, it would be no exaggeration to suggest that Dubai World was for all intents and purposes "too big to fail". Being state-owned, run by the right-hand person of the ruler himself (until early last week), and in the limelight for the most eye-catching tourist/expatriate/investment properties in the world, Dubai World served as an extension of the ruler's ambitions in every direction.

Still, although the company owns some globally cash-rich businesses, such as Dubai Ports, and is famous for other businesses, such as Emirates Air, Dubai World has been held down by the weight of its over-ambitious real-estate ventures under the umbrella of Nakheel. Announcing a grand property venture is easy, finishing it on time and delivering the real estate profitably to one's customers isn't quite that.

More importantly, unlike cash-flow based lending (such as loans to a factory), lending for real estate is termed as asset-based lending; it depends much on the ability of the company to sell its properties for above cost, or to secure a running rental income in excess of borrowing costs. Unfinished properties don't let you do either, so it is clear that Nakheel was always going to be a challenge.

Real and unreal guarantees
The next question that popped up in the market's mind was that the rulers of Dubai had somehow violated their implicit guarantee on Dubai World. Unfortunately, that very notion is wrong in the world of credit (that is, debt): there is no such thing as an implicit guarantee; what really matters is if there is an explicit guarantee. In this case, there wasn't. So the rulers of Dubai may have decided to take advantage and escape the debt load. Essentially, this implies they had no expectation or belief that the property projects will be completed, much less that they would be profitably completed.

As the Financial Times reported on November 26, the following statement was issued by the ruling family of Dubai to debunk any of the stories of the Dubai World standstill being the result of a capricious action by one or more of its princes:

    Our intervention in Dubai World was carefully planned and reflects its specific financial position. The government is spearheading the restructuring of this commercial operation in the full knowledge of how the markets would react. We understand the concerns of the market and the creditors in particular. However we have had to intervene because of the need to take decisive action to address its particular debt burden. Like most global cities, Dubai has experienced its share of economic and social challenges in this global downturn. No market is immune from economic issues. This is a sensible business decision. We want to ensure resources are deployed in the full knowledge that they are used to enhance the businesses of the Dubai World Group, build on the restructuring that has already been taking place and ensure long-term commercial success. Further information will be made available early next week.

As one of my friends remarked after reading the statement, "If this is them being 'carefully planned', imagine what they would be doing in the case of an impulsive action." In any event, whatever idea the rulers of Dubai professed to have about the "full knowledge of how the markets would react", it must have been from sources quite removed from reality, as Thursday's big declines in global stock markets led by Asia and Europe showed. Or perhaps they had sold some puts on the Hang Seng Index - what do I know?

Contagion?
While much of the European market reaction was tempered on Friday, declines in Asia suggested that fears of a fresh bout of contagion - the notion that all emerging markets would suffer from the fallout from Dubai - could be on the horizon. There are many reasons for this fear, not the least of which would be the stunning performances of such emerging markets over the past year or so; but also because of fears that many a Dubai lurks in this part of the world.

In the same week, we had Vietnam devaluing its currency and bumping up interest rates - taking up the dubious distinction of the only Asian country that needed to do so in 2009.

From a purely top level perspective, the idea is nonsensical. The total size of Dubai obligations, at $80 billion or so, represents a boil on the backside of the debt monster running amok in the developed and developing markets. For example, it represents barely 5% of the mortgage obligations of the US market alone; a paltry 10% of the sovereign wealth fund in neighboring Abu Dhabi; a smallish 3% of the foreign exchange reserves of China, and so on.

Then again, there is the normal contagion with which the likes of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank are familiar (being the root causes of the same); then there is the "contagion from extrapolation" that markets are more familiar with. This is where things actually get hairy.

Let us remove all the drama from the Dubai saga, and consider the facts:
1. High debt levels.
2. Poor performing collateral for debt.
3. Markets that expect continuing "strategic" bailouts.
4. A fractious political climate around debt discussions.
5. No real (sector-specific) growth to support future repayment.

If I read just the above and was asked to guess what exactly was the subject being discussed, a large number of options would spring up:
a. US mortgage debt.
b. Senior and subordinated debt of global banks.
c. Smaller European governments (Greece, Ireland etc).
d. Leveraged loans and high-yield bonds in the US and Europe.
e. Chinese bank lending to the property sector.

Don't be put off by the lack of specifics (there isn't the space to go into all of them); what really matters is that the rough, back-of-the-envelope calculation for the above five sectors alone is $4 trillion to $5 trillion. When considered in that light, the Dubai debacle suddenly becomes a mere portent of things to come; the thin end of the wedge as fundamentals reassert from the perilously slippery slope of systemic liquidity-driven prices.

Over the weekend, a number of more supportive headlines have sprung up in the financial press with respect to the Dubai story: that Abu Dhabi is "willing to help on a case-by-case basis"; that, as noted above, the "UAE central bank has agreed to provide emergency liquidity"; and even more fantastically, that the Gulf Cooperation Council (composed of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE) will ride to the rescue of Dubai. All that may indeed come through, but, whatever happens, Pandora's Box has now been opened.

Dievs zina labāk. Tekstā viss labais no Islāma, bet trūkumi un sliktais no manis. Ja mans dažkārt skarbais tonis kādu aizvaino, tad ziniet, ka tas nav mans nolūks. Mans nolūks un novēlējums ir lai cilvēki patiesi apdomātu savas attiecības ar Dievu un cenšanās piedāvāt Islāmu tāds kāds tas ir. Ja es sev paglaimoju, tad saku, ka man ir nesabalansētas zināšanas. Arī Islāma zinātnieki dažkārt kļūdās un maldina savos tekstos citus, tad jau ahmeds kādu reizi savās amatieriskajās zināšanās noteikti. Šī foruma darbība un mani komentāri nav attiecināmi uz Latvijas muslimu kopienu vai organizācijām. Es stāstu par Islāmu tā kā to saprotu šodien, jau 7 gadus apgūstot Islāmu, un manām zināšanām augot, nākotnē varētu zināt un skaidrot precīzāk, nekļūdīgāk, ar mazāk pārpratumiem un labākā izteiksmes veidā. Es gaidu padomus, bet kritiku uztveru neveselīgi.

129

Re: Šis tas no muslimu valstīm un sabiedrībām


Nīderlande: Nav saistības starp gejiem armijā un Srebrenicas slaktiņu

http://www.tvnet.lv/zinas/arvalstis/308 … s_slaktinu

Nīderlandes valdība noraida atvaļinātā ASV ģenerāļa Džona Šēhana ceturtdien paustos spriedumus, ka Nīderlandes ANO vienības nav spējušas novērst Srebrenicas slaktiņu, jo armijas rindās bijuši homoseksuāli karavīri.

"Tas ir gluži vai neticami, ka tik cienījams cilvēks var runāt tādas muļķības," sacīja Nīderlandes Aizsardzības ministrijas preses sekretārs Rodžers van de Veterings.

Bijušais NATO komandieris Šēhans, ceturtdien ASV Senātā piedaloties debatēs par priekšlikumu armijā ļaut dienēt atklātiem homoseksuāļiem, pauda uzskatu, ka ANO spēku sastāvā ietilpstošajiem nīderlandiešu karavīriem 1995.gadā neizdevās novērst Srebrenicas slaktiņu arī tāpēc, ka starp militārpersonām bija atklāti geji.

Šēhāns iebilst pret ASV prezidenta Baraka Obamas ierosinājumu atcelt aizliegumu armijā dienēt atklātiem homoseksuāļiem.

Viņš norādīja, ka pēc aukstā kara beigām Eiropas militārajā sistēmā notikušas būtiskas pārmaiņas un secināts, ka "vairs nav nepieciešamības pēc aktīviem karaspēkiem". Kā uzsvēra atvaļinātais ģenerālis, "socializācijas" procesa rezultātā, kas cita starpā pieļāva arī "atklātu homoseksuāļu dienēšanu", galvenais uzsvars tika likts uz "miera uzturēšanas operācijām, jo viņi neticēja, ka vācieši atkal uzbruks vai ka padomju spēki atgriezīsies".

"Nīderlandiešu spēki, kuriem bija jāaizsargā Srebrenica no serbiem," viņš norādīja, "nebija pietiekami sagatavoti, tiem trūka vadības, un pilsētā ienāca serbi, ar roku dzelžiem pieslēdza karavīrus pie telefonstabiem, aizveda musulmaņus prom un viņus noslaktēja."

"Vai nīderlandiešu spēku vadība jums teica, ka Srebrenicu neizdevās nosargāt homoseksuālo karavīru dēļ?" Senāta Bruņoto spēku komitejas vadītājs Karls Levins aicināja Šēhanu precizēt iepriekš sacīto.

Bijušais ģenerālis uz šo jautājumu atbildēja apstiprinoši, piebilstot, ka nīderlandiešu spēku vadība "to uzskatīja par vienu no iemesliem". To Šēhanam atzinis Nīderlandes armijas bijušais štāba priekšnieks.

Turpretī Levins bijušās militārpersonas izteikumus par homoseksuāļu saistību ar Srebrenicas slaktiņa nenovēršanu nodēvēja par "pilnīgi nepamatotiem".

Faktam, ka ANO spēku sastāvā ietilpstošajiem nīderlandiešu karavīriem neizdevās atvairīt Bosnijas serbu spēku uzbrukumu, "nav nekādas saistības ar seksuālo orientāciju", uzskata komisijas vadītājs.

Srebrenicas slaktiņā 1995.gada jūlijā dzīvību zaudēja gandrīz 8000 Bosnijas musulmaņu vīriešu un zēnu.

Dievs zina labāk. Tekstā viss labais no Islāma, bet trūkumi un sliktais no manis. Ja mans dažkārt skarbais tonis kādu aizvaino, tad ziniet, ka tas nav mans nolūks. Mans nolūks un novēlējums ir lai cilvēki patiesi apdomātu savas attiecības ar Dievu un cenšanās piedāvāt Islāmu tāds kāds tas ir. Ja es sev paglaimoju, tad saku, ka man ir nesabalansētas zināšanas. Arī Islāma zinātnieki dažkārt kļūdās un maldina savos tekstos citus, tad jau ahmeds kādu reizi savās amatieriskajās zināšanās noteikti. Šī foruma darbība un mani komentāri nav attiecināmi uz Latvijas muslimu kopienu vai organizācijām. Es stāstu par Islāmu tā kā to saprotu šodien, jau 7 gadus apgūstot Islāmu, un manām zināšanām augot, nākotnē varētu zināt un skaidrot precīzāk, nekļūdīgāk, ar mazāk pārpratumiem un labākā izteiksmes veidā. Es gaidu padomus, bet kritiku uztveru neveselīgi.

130

Re: Šis tas no muslimu valstīm un sabiedrībām

Senegālā protestēs pret milzu monumentu
http://www.delfi.lv/news/world/other/ar … d=31027743

Senegālas varas iestādes atļāva galvaspilsētā Dakārā rīkot protesta mītiņu pret neviennozīmīgi vērtētu 50 metrus augstu bronzas monumentu, kas izveidots par godu Senegālas neatkarības 50. gadadienai, ziņo BBC.

Monuments attēlo vīrieti, sievieti un bērnu, to plānots atklāt svētdien neatkarības dienas svinību pasākumā.

Musulmaņu līderi jau nodevēja valsts prezidenta Abdulaja Vadē ierosināto milzu monumentu par "pretislāma" objektu. Tāpat 28 miljonus ASV dolāru (aptuveni 14 miljonu latu) vērto projektu kritizē par nelietderīgu valsts naudas izšķērdēšanu, atgādinot, ka 20% iedzīvotāju valstī dzīvo zem nabadzības sliekšņa.

Ziemeļkorejas strādnieku izveidotā bronzas kompozīcija ir augstāka par ASV Brīvības statuju.